clang-tidy suggestion: deleting nullptr has no effect #1

Open
uli wants to merge 1 commit from pointer-exchange into main
First-time contributor
  • I wanted to ask whether the memory_order on those exchange / assignement statements could/should be optimized (== explicitely set to anything else than default seq_cst). But I don't know what would be best there.
+ I wanted to ask whether the memory_order on those exchange / assignement statements could/should be optimized (== explicitely set to anything else than default seq_cst). But I don't know what would be best there.
uli force-pushed pointer-exchange from 13e3761535 to 07581f9637 2026-07-09 17:45:02 +02:00 Compare
This pull request can be merged automatically.
This branch is out-of-date with the base branch
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin pointer-exchange:pointer-exchange
git switch pointer-exchange

Merge

Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.

Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.

git switch main
git merge --no-ff pointer-exchange
git switch pointer-exchange
git rebase main
git switch main
git merge --ff-only pointer-exchange
git switch pointer-exchange
git rebase main
git switch main
git merge --no-ff pointer-exchange
git switch main
git merge --squash pointer-exchange
git switch main
git merge --ff-only pointer-exchange
git switch main
git merge pointer-exchange
git push origin main
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
henry/ui-art-rt!1
No description provided.